Understanding Gender Disparity in STEM: Exploring the Factors Influencing Women's Retention and Career Decisions

Introduction: The Gender Gap in STEM

Despite decades of advocacy, women remain underrepresented and under-retained in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). While initiatives have successfully increased the number of women entering STEM fields, retention rates for women lag significantly behind their male counterparts. This phenomenon raises critical questions:

• Why do women leave STEM careers?

• What factors motivate them to persist in these male-dominated industries?

An original qualitative phenomenological study conducted by Theory in Practice aimed to explore these questions, focusing on women's lived experiences in STEM industries across the United States. This study revealed that women’s decisions to stay or leave STEM are shaped by a complex interplay of personal, social, and professional factors, providing insights beyond quantitative data's surface.

The Retention Challenge: A Complex Issue

1. Identity and Career Persistence

Retention of women in STEM cannot be reduced to statistics or singular explanations. Instead, it requires understanding how identity—personal, social, and professional—shapes women’s career trajectories.

• Personal Identity: How women see themselves, their passions, and their aspirations.

• Social Identity: How they believe they are perceived by colleagues, mentors, and society.

• Professional Identity: How they view their roles and contributions within the workplace.

For women in STEM, identity crises often arise at the intersections of these dimensions. For example, balancing the demands of being a mother and a marine biologist or navigating societal expectations as a woman in engineering can create tensions that challenge their persistence. These identity conflicts are compounded by systemic biases, workplace culture, and the pressure to conform in male-dominated environments.

2. Environmental Pressures

Research shows that women often face environments where they feel marginalized or undervalued. Persistent gender biases, lack of mentorship, and insufficient role models contribute to a culture that can alienate women and push them toward career exits. These pressures highlight the need for cultural shifts and structural changes in STEM industries.

Why Qualitative Research Matters

Quantitative studies reveal trends but often fail to capture the nuanced “why” behind them. This is where qualitative methods, particularly phenomenological research, provide invaluable insights. By focusing on individuals’ lived experiences, qualitative research uncovers the complex realities that numbers cannot explain.

• Methodology: This study used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to delve deeply into participants’ experiences (Smith & Nizza, 2022).

• Semi-Structured Interviews: Women working or formerly working in STEM shared their stories, allowing researchers to identify patterns, themes, and unique perspectives.

• Outcome: A richer understanding of the challenges women face and the motivations behind their decisions to persist or leave STEM careers.

Findings: Lived Experiences and Identity Development

1. The Role of Identity Development

The study revealed that identity development plays a pivotal role in women’s career decisions:

• Personal Identity Conflicts: Women often grapple with societal expectations and the desire to pursue their passions in STEM.

• Social Identity Challenges: The perception of being “the only woman in the room” can isolate women, making them feel like outsiders in their own fields.

• Professional Identity Evolution: Women who remain in STEM often cite a strong sense of purpose and fulfillment in their roles despite systemic challenges.

2. Mentorship and Support Systems

Support from mentors and allies was a recurring theme among women who persisted in STEM. These relationships provided validation, guidance, and advocacy in otherwise isolating environments.

3. Organizational Culture

Workplace culture, including inclusivity, representation, and work-life balance policies, significantly influenced women’s decisions. Organizations that actively fostered diversity and equity saw higher retention rates among women.

Actionable Insights: Addressing the Gender Gap

1. Cultivate Inclusive Environments

Organizations must create cultures where women feel valued, supported, and seen. This includes:

• Addressing implicit biases in hiring and promotion.

• Offering flexible work arrangements that accommodate diverse life stages.

2. Strengthen Mentorship Programs

Mentorship is essential for helping women navigate their careers in STEM. Organizations should:

• Pair women with mentors who understand their unique challenges.

• Encourage cross-gender mentorship to build allyship and understanding.

3. Promote Role Models and Representation

Visible representation matters. Women in leadership positions inspire younger generations and challenge stereotypes about who belongs in STEM.

4. Incorporate Identity Development in Training

Providing resources and training that help individuals navigate identity challenges can empower women to persist in STEM.

Conclusion: Building a More Inclusive Future in STEM

The gender disparity in STEM is a multifaceted issue that cannot be solved with a one-size-fits-all approach. This study highlights the importance of understanding women's lived experiences in these fields, particularly the complex interplay of identity, environment, and support systems.

Addressing these factors requires systemic change, including more inclusive workplaces, more substantial mentorship opportunities, and greater representation of women in leadership roles. By prioritizing these efforts, we can create an environment where women enter STEM and thrive within it, enriching these fields with diverse perspectives and talents.

Synopsis: Key Takeaways for Busy Readers

• Retention Challenges: Women leave STEM due to identity conflicts, workplace culture, and systemic biases.

• Qualitative Insights: Lived experiences reveal the importance of personal, social, and professional identity in career decisions.

• Support Systems: Mentorship, representation, and inclusive environments are critical for retention.

• Actionable Steps: Foster inclusive cultures, promote mentorship, and provide role models to improve retention rates.

References

1. Burleson, S., Fouad, N. A., Janke, S. E., Stelter, R. L., & Xie, Y. (2021). Retention of women in STEM: Understanding the persistence of women in STEM industries. Journal of STEM Education Research, 15(2), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09876-2

2. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

3. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

4. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.

5. Heidegger, M. (1958). The question of being. Twayne Publishers.

6. Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology (W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans.). George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

7. Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.

8. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204

9. K. K., S., & Miranda, J. (2022). SCHOOL LEADERSHIP IN THE 21ST CENTURY: SHARED EXPERIENCES OF THE CLARETIAN PRINCIPALS IN NORTHEAST INDIA. https://core.ac.uk/download/543118724.pdf

10. SOLIHAH, A. M. (2023). A Descriptive Study of Using English Songs to Learn English Listening Skills of Seventh Grade Students at MTs Muhammadiyah 8 Purbalingga in Academic Year 2022/2023. https://core.ac.uk/download/578774183.pdf

11. Danford, C. (2023). Understanding the Evidence: Qualitative Research Designs. Urologic Nursing, 43(1), 41-45.

12. Watson, L. C. (1976). Understanding a Life History as a Subjective Document: Hermeneutical and Phenomenological Perspectives. Ethos. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1976.4.1.02a00050

13. School leadership in the 21st century: shared experiences of claretians principals in northeast india | agpe the royal gondwana research journal of history, science, economic, political, and social science.https://agpegondwanajournal.co.in/index.php/agpe/article/view/175